Cisco 400-007 Cisco Certified Design Expert (CCDE v3.1) Exam Practice Test

Cisco SD-WAN Cloud OnRamp SaaS optimizes cloud application performance by dynamically measuring SaaS application paths from multiple branch edges toward the Microsoft 365 cloud.

It automatically selects the best-performing path, continuously monitors SLA metrics (latency, loss, jitter), and dynamically reroutes based on real-time performance.

This directly addresses SaaS resiliency across multiple ISPs with minimal manual intervention and is aligned with CCDE v3.1 SD-WAN design methodologies for SaaS optimization.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Cloud OnRamp gateway is for IaaS optimization (AWS, Azure), not SaaS.

B: Cloud OnRamp SWG (Secure Web Gateway) is for internet-bound security inspection, not SaaS path optimization.

C: "Cloud OnRamp" alone is too general; SaaS is the specific solution for this SaaS use case.

A (Jenkins):Jenkins is a leading Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) automation tool for building, testing, and deploying code automatically.

Other options explained:

B: Ansible is used for configuration management and automation.

C: Perl is a programming language, not a CI/CD platform.

D: Chef is a configuration management tool.

C (NFV - Network Functions Virtualization):ETSI NFV framework allows virtualizing network functions (firewalls, load balancers, etc.) on standard hardware, promoting flexibility, cost reduction, and hardware independence.

Other options explained:

A: NPIV relates to Fibre Channel storage, not network virtualization.

B: NFVIS is Cisco's NFV infrastructure software, not the ETSI standard itself.

D: VNF refers to individual virtualized functions, not the framework.

B (RPVST+ — Rapid Per VLAN Spanning Tree Plus): Provides fast convergence while blocking redundant paths to prevent loops — fail closed behavior under failure scenarios.

C (MST — Multiple Spanning Tree): Provides loop prevention and isolates failures to specific instances (VLANs), maintaining fail closed protection.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: EIGRP is a routing protocol; does not operate at Layer 2 to provide fail-closed loop protection.

D: L2MP (Layer 2 Multipathing) allows multiple active links but requires additional loop prevention mechanisms.

—

A (IaaS within a private cloud):IaaS allows on-demand scaling of compute and storage resources, and private cloud deployment reduces capital expenditures by pooling hardware resources and increasing utilization, while allowing control over security and compliance.

Other options explained:

B: On-prem IaaS still requires significant CapEx.

C: PaaS delivers platform services, but the scenario is focused on network systems.

D: SaaS on-prem is uncommon and does not address infrastructure scaling.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

CAPEX (Capital Expenditures) focuses on up-front hardware investments, like routers, switches, and appliances.

A: Scalability directly impacts CAPEX—network designs that require fewer or more scalable hardware components reduce capital investment costs.

B and D are more influenced by OPEX (operational expenditures).

C (complexity) is a broader design challenge, not directly tied to CAPEX.

==========

To support high-bandwidth, low-latency Layer 2 communication between DB Server 1 and DB Server 2, you must create a direct Layer 2 path between SW1 and SW2. Using REP (Resilient Ethernet Protocol) segments ensures loop-free Layer 2 operation without the drawbacks of STP convergence delays.

Option C is correct: Adding a third REP segment (Segment 3) directly between SW1 and SW2 isolates the traffic between the two DB servers and ensures deterministic behavior with fast convergence.

Option A (LACP with STP) introduces STP blocking and doesn’t align well with REP's control plane.

Option B and D: Overloading existing segments or splitting new links into existing REP segments does not offer the same direct path, bandwidth, or deterministic behavior.

==========

In this architecture:

A secure web proxy is introduced to inspect and filter all web (HTTP/HTTPS) traffic.

Remaining traffic (non-web) must pass through an NGFW with IPS capabilities.

Both the web proxy and NGFW reside between the collapsed distribution/core and internet edge.

To enforce that all web traffic is directed to the proxy appliance for inspection and non-web traffic follows its usual path to the NGFW:

A. Policy-Based Routing (PBR) on the Collapsed Core

This allows traffic classification based on destination port (e.g., TCP 80/443) and selectively reroutes web traffic to the proxy. Non-web traffic continues toward the NGFW. PBR is essential here because traditional routing (based only on destination IP) would not differentiate between traffic types.

D. Static Routing on the Appliance

The proxy appliance must return the traffic back toward the NGFW for final processing and internet egress. This is typically achieved using static routes on the proxy device, ensuring the return path sends packets back to the correct firewall interface for consistent inspection.

❌B. Policy-based routing on the internet edge: Not applicable here, as rerouting must occur closer to the source (collapsed core), before traffic reaches the internet edge.

❌C. Policy-based routing on firewalls: This adds unnecessary complexity. Firewalls should focus on enforcing security policies, not traffic redirection logic in this scenario.

This approach adheres to CCDE v3.1 best practices by separating policy enforcement functions and enabling scalable, deterministic traffic flow through layered security appliances.

Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) is an IETF standard specifically designed to improve scalability, convergence, and loop prevention in data center environments while supporting virtualization at scale. TRILL replaces traditional Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) with a shortest path forwarding protocol, combining the benefits of routing with the simplicity of bridging.

TRILL uses IS-IS as its control plane protocol to calculate optimal paths dynamically, enabling better bandwidth utilization and faster failover—critical for server virtualization that demands highly available, resilient, and scalable Layer 2 networks.

Why other options are incorrect:

A. Data Center Bridging (DCB) is a set of enhancements for Ethernet but doesn’t directly address virtualization scaling.

B. Unified Fabric combines storage and data traffic but is not IETF standardized and focuses on cabling consolidation.

D. FabricPath is Cisco proprietary, not IETF standard.

—

When an ACL is applied inbound on the Internet gateway interface facing the internal (trusted) network, the source IP address seen in the ACL will be the address after NAT translation has been applied to outbound traffic. This is called the inside global address:

Inside global = Public IP assigned by NAT to inside traffic for external use.

Inside local = Internal IP address prior to NAT.

Why other options are incorrect:

B, D: Outside addresses refer to external devices, not internal traffic.

C: Inside local is seen before NAT, not after.

—

D (Lifecycle model):The lifecycle model aligns directly with traditional project management (such as Waterfall). It follows a sequential, phase-driven process: requirement gathering, design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. Each phase must be completed before moving to the next, with defined milestones and documentation.

Other options explained:

A: "Static model" is not a standard recognized development model.

B: Agile is iterative and adaptive, opposite of traditional models.

C: Evolutionary delivery is more incremental, not fully aligned with traditional models.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Design Expert (CCDE)

Summarization reduces control plane state by abstracting detailed route information. As packets move further away from the destination subnet, the network advertises summarized prefixes instead of individual host or subnet routes, minimizing control plane overhead and routing table size. This helps scale large networks and improves convergence times.

While aggregation and summarization are related, summarization specifically refers to the propagation of route prefixes and their abstraction — making it the precise fit for this question.

B (Enable phone VPN authentication based on end-user username and password):When legacy devices don’t support certificate-based authentication, fallback to username/password provides a temporary workaround while maintaining PCI compliance, assuming strong credentials and secure tunnels are used.

Other options explained:

A: Immediate hardware replacement may not be feasible.

C: TLS 1.0 fallback violates PCI standards, which prohibit deprecated protocols.

D: Clear text authentication is non-compliant with PCI requirements.

C (Class-Based Weighted Fair Queuing - CBWFQ): CBWFQ allows assigning bandwidth limits (in this case, 2 Mbps) to specific traffic classes, effectively controlling scavenger traffic without dropping excess packets unnecessarily.

Other options explained:

A: Policing drops excess traffic immediately rather than queuing.

B: LLQ is for delay-sensitive traffic, not scavenger control.

D: Shaping is useful but typically applied at interface level, not specific traffic classes.

A (Roaming delay):Voice requires seamless roaming with minimal handoff delay to avoid call drops.

B (Uniform radio coverage):Consistent signal coverage is essential for maintaining voice call quality throughout the facility.

Other options explained:

C: High channel utilization affects capacity but not directly the initial readiness assessment.

D: Latency is important but typically captured during ongoing performance testing, not pre-assessment.

E: TX power changes indicate instability but are not primary readiness criteria.

Application performance depends on the end-to-end delay experienced by the traffic, which includes:

Queuing delay at each device.

Serialization delay based on link speed and packet size.

Propagation delay.

For the application to meet its performance SLA, the total of all delays (queuing + serialization + propagation) must remain within the application's maximum tolerable delay budget. This is critical for delay-sensitive applications such as voice or real-time video.

This directly aligns with CCDE v3.1 business-driven design, where application requirements dictate network performance guarantees.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Focusing on individual devices ignores cumulative delay.

B: Uniform queuing delay isn’t practical or necessary.

C: Default queue sizes are not always suitable for real-time applications.

—

B (Spine must connect to every leaf):Spine-and-leaf designs require full mesh connectivity between spines and leaves to ensure consistent low-latency, non-blocking performance.

E (Leaf must connect to every spine):Each leaf switch must connect to all spine switches to guarantee even load distribution and fault tolerance.

Other options explained:

A: Spine switches should not connect to each other in standard spine-and-leaf designs.

C: Leaf switches do not connect to each other directly.

D: Endpoints connect to leaf switches, not spines.

In this case, the bank seeks a solution that addresses scalability, manageability, application visibility, security (encryption and segmentation), and operational simplicity while aiming to reduce capital expenses. All these characteristics point directly to an SD-WAN architecture.

A non-managed (self-hosted) SD-WAN deployment:

Supports Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP), reducing deployment time and operational burden.

Provides application-level visibility and intelligent path control.

Enables strong segmentation and end-to-end encryption via templates and policy engines.

Helps reduce CAPEX through the use of lower-cost broadband and centralized management.

While a “managed SD-WAN” solution (Option C) might be suitable in some cases, it typically involves higher OPEX. The question emphasizes CAPEX reduction, favoring an in-house SD-WAN solution.

This approach aligns with CCDE v3.1's “Scenario-based Design Strategy Guidance” and “Technology Comparisons and Use Cases” topics that emphasize selecting technologies aligned to business objectives and architectural scalability.

==========

Graphical user interface Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Switch clustering (VSS, StackWise, MLAG, MC-LAG, vPC) at the distribution/core layer eliminates the need for STP convergence by creating a logical single switch for Layer 2 and Layer 3 functions.

This design provides active-active uplinks, faster convergence, and loop-free operation, directly addressing STP and FHRP limitations.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Access layer clustering is less common and doesn’t address core convergence delays.

C: PortFast improves convergence on edge ports but not in the core/distribution path.

D: BFD enhances Layer 3 failure detection but not Layer 2 loop prevention or STP convergence.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of Design Expert (CCDE)

Controller-based networks centralize control logic, abstracting hardware complexity and providing consistency. This results in:

C. Abstraction: Devices are treated as policy endpoints rather than configuration silos, simplifying network operations and scalability.

E. Consistent Configuration: Policies and configurations are pushed uniformly across all devices from the controller, reducing human error and improving compliance.

These features align with CCDE v3.1 recommendations for modern, policy-driven, and scalable architectures that are easier to manage and automate.

==========

In this scenario, the application itself duplicates data transmission across two separate NICs on Host A, with the intention that at least one copy will reach Host B, regardless of any single path or link failure. While this increases redundancy at the application and host level, the underlying network must also support rapid failure recovery to avoid packet loss during convergence events.

Among the options provided:

A. EIGRP with feasible successors provides pre-computed backup routes but still requires routing protocol convergence upon failure, which could result in millisecond-scale interruption—enough to cause data loss if packets are in transit.

B. BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection) offers rapid detection of link failures, but by itself does not provide traffic redirection or packet protection; it simply informs the routing protocol faster.

D. Static routes lack dynamic convergence capabilities and would not offer high availability across dynamic failure points unless manually configured with tracking—still less responsive and scalable.

C. IP Fast Reroute (IP FRR) is specifically designed to offer sub-50ms convergence time by pre-installing backup paths in the forwarding plane. Upon detecting a failure, traffic is immediately switched to the pre-computed alternate path without waiting for the routing protocol to reconverge. This ensures minimal disruption and best supports lossless delivery for high-availability applications.

IP FRR is consistent with CCDE v3.1 design principles where sub-second convergence and resiliency are critical in mission-critical enterprise and data center architectures.

B (Use only secure protocols): Management and administrative access to Internet edge routers must use secure protocols (SSH, SNMPv3, HTTPS) to prevent interception or unauthorized access.

E (Restrict administrative access): Limiting administrative access via interface ACLs and clear login banners ensures that only authorized personnel can access the system, satisfying compliance and security requirements.

Other options explained:

A: Filtering infrastructure IP space is good hygiene but not directly related to compliance.

C: Logging is valuable for operations and incident response but not a compliance control by itself.

D: EBGP advertisements relate to routing policy, not compliance regulation.

A (EIGRP summarization):Summarization reduces unnecessary routing information exchange, simplifies the routing table, and improves convergence.

D (Route leaking on London-Rome link):Route leaking allows specific prefixes (such as important routes for direct communication) to be advertised across the London-Rome link, ensuring it's utilized where appropriate.

Other options explained:

B: Filtering routes on Barcelona would prevent reachability unnecessarily.

C: Filtering on London-Rome link would prevent its usage entirely.

The two most common challenges for organizations adopting container technologies are:

B (Security): Containers introduce unique security challenges, such as shared kernels, namespace isolation, image vulnerabilities, and orchestration exposure.

E (Skilled staff): Containerization requires specialized skills in orchestration (e.g., Kubernetes), CI/CD, and microservices design, which may not be readily available in many IT teams.

Other options explained:

A: Performance is generally good for containers; overhead is minimal.

C: Cost savings are often a driver for containerization.

D: Deployment is streamlined via orchestration platforms.

F: Compliance is important but less frequently cited as the initial adoption barrier.

—

A (TRILL - Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links):TRILL enables multipathing at Layer 2, eliminating classic STP blocking, allowing all uplinks to be active simultaneously, and uses IS-IS based control plane for conversational MAC learning.

Other options explained:

B: LISP operates at Layer 3 for endpoint mobility, not Layer 2 multipathing.

C: MSTP still blocks some links under normal operation.

D: Switch stacking merges multiple physical switches into one logical switch but does not provide true multipathing across independent switches.

Overview of the Problem:

The question addresses the design of a multi-controller SDN architecture, a key aspect of the CCDE v3.1 blueprint under "Network Architecture Principles." SDN separates the control plane (handled by controllers) from the data plane (handled by switches), and a multi-controller setup enhances scalability and reliability. The requirements focus on ensuring fast failover, resilient and low-latency connections, reduced connectivity loss with smart recovery, and improved connectivity through path diversity and capacity awareness. The control plane component must address the connectivity and reliability of the communication paths between switches and controllers, known as the control path.

Analysis of Requirements:

Fast Failover for Control Traffic:When a controller fails, the network must quickly redirect control traffic (e.g., OpenFlow or other SDN protocol messages) to an available controller to maintain network operations.

Short Distance and High Resiliency in Switch-Controller Connections:The connections (control paths) between switches and controllers should minimize latency (short distance) and be highly resilient to failures, ensuring continuous communication.

Reduce Connectivity Loss and Enable Smart Recovery:The architecture must minimize disruptions from controller or link failures and use intelligent mechanisms to recover, enhancing SDN survivability.

Path Diversity and Capacity Awareness:The control paths should offer multiple routes between switches and controllers (path diversity) and consider link capacity to optimize traffic distribution and avoid congestion.

Analysis of Options:

A. Control Node Reliability:This refers to the reliability of individual controllers (e.g., ensuring controllers have redundant hardware or high availability features). While reliable controllers are important, this option focuses on the nodes themselves, not the connectivity or communication paths between switches and controllers. It doesn’t address path diversity, failover speed, or smart recovery mechanisms, making it insufficient for meeting the requirements.

B. Controller State Consistency:Controller state consistency ensures that all controllers in a multi-controller setup maintain synchronized state information (e.g., network topology, flow rules). This is critical for seamless operation but doesn’t directly address control path connectivity, failover, or path diversity. While state consistency supports failover by ensuring backup controllers have up-to-date information, it’s not the primary component for achieving fast failover, resiliency, or capacity awareness in the control path.

C. Control Path Reliability:Control path reliability focuses on the robustness and efficiency of the communication paths between switches and controllers in an SDN architecture. This includes:

Fast Failover:Implementing protocols like OpenFlow with multiple controller connections or fast-failover mechanisms (e.g., using BFD or link aggregation) to redirect control traffic quickly when a controller fails.

Short Distance and Resiliency:Designing control paths with low-latency links (e.g., direct or high-speed connections) and redundancy (e.g., multiple physical or logical paths) to ensure resiliency.

Smart Recovery:Using intelligent routing or load-balancing protocols to recover from failures, such as rerouting control traffic to alternate paths.

Path Diversity and Capacity Awareness:Incorporating multipath routing (e.g., using SDN protocols or IP routing) and capacity-aware algorithms to distribute control traffic across diverse paths, avoiding congestion.Control path reliability directly addresses all requirements by ensuring the communication infrastructure between switches and controllers is robust, flexible, and optimized, making it the correct choice.

D. Controller Clustering:Controller clustering involves grouping controllers to act as a single logical unit, improving scalability and fault tolerance. Clustering ensures that if one controller fails, others in the cluster take over, and it supports state synchronization. However, clustering focuses on the controllers’ coordination and redundancy, not the control paths’ connectivity, latency, or diversity. While clustering supports failover, it doesn’t inherently address short-distance connections, path diversity, or capacity awareness, making it less relevant than control path reliability.

Correct Answer (C):

Control Path Reliabilityis the control plane component that must be built to meet the requirements:

Fast Failover:Achieved through redundant control paths and fast-failover mechanisms (e.g., OpenFlow’s multi-controller support or BFD for link failure detection).

Short Distance and High Resiliency:Ensured by designing low-latency, redundant links between switches and controllers, often using high-speed or dedicated connections.

Reduced Connectivity Loss and Smart Recovery:Supported by intelligent path selection and recovery mechanisms, such as rerouting control traffic to alternate controllers or paths.

Path Diversity and Capacity Awareness:Enabled by multipath routing and capacity-aware load balancing, ensuring efficient use of available links.Control path reliability encompasses the design of the communication infrastructure, aligning with SDN best practices and CCDE v3.1 principles for resilient network architectures.

Why Not A, B, or D?

Control Node Reliability (A):Focuses on individual controller reliability, not the control paths, missing key requirements like path diversity and smart recovery.

Controller State Consistency (B):Ensures synchronized controller states but doesn’t address control path connectivity, latency, or diversity.

Controller Clustering (D):Enhances controller redundancy but doesn’t directly improve control path resiliency, latency, or capacity awareness.

Relevant CCDE v3.1 Blueprint Extract:

The CCDE v3.1 blueprint, as outlined in theCisco Certified Design Expert (CCDE 400-007) Official Cert Guideand Cisco Learning Network resources, includes the following under "Network Architecture Principles":

SDN Architecture Design:Designing scalable and resilient SDN control planes, including multi-controller setups and control path optimization.

High Availability and Resiliency:Ensuring network architectures support fast failover, redundant paths, and intelligent recovery mechanisms.

Connectivity Optimization:Incorporating path diversity and capacity awareness to enhance network performance and survivability.

FromCisco Certified Design Expert (CCDE 400-007) Official Cert Guide(2023):

"In SDN architectures, control path reliability is critical for ensuring robust communication between switches and controllers. This includes designing redundant, low-latency paths, implementing fast-failover mechanisms, and enabling path diversity to improve resiliency and performance."

FromCCDE v3 Practice Labs: Preparing for the Cisco Certified Design Expert Lab Exam(Duggan, 2023):

"Multi-controller SDN designs require careful attention to control path reliability. Features like multipath routing, capacity-aware load balancing, and fast-failover protocols ensure that the control plane remains operational during failures, supporting SDN survivability."

Industry-Standard Reference:

SDN control path design is well-documented in industry standards, such as the Open Networking Foundation’s OpenFlow specifications, which emphasize redundant controller connections and path diversity. Cisco’s SD-WAN and ACI (Application Centric Infrastructure) documentation also highlight control path reliability as a cornerstone of resilient SDN architectures.

Official Cisco Documentation Reference:

Cisco’s SDN solutions, such as Cisco ACI and SD-WAN, emphasize control path reliability in multi-controller setups:

Cisco ACI Design Guide: “Control path reliability ensures that fabric switches maintain continuous communication with APIC controllers, using redundant paths and fast-failover mechanisms.”

Cisco SD-WAN Design Guide: “The control plane leverages path diversity and capacity awareness to optimize connectivity between vEdge devices and vSmart controllers.”These principles align with CCDE v3.1’s focus on resilient, business-driven network architectures.

Sources:

Cisco Certified Design Expert (CCDE 400-007) Official Cert Guide, Cisco Press, 2023.

CCDE v3 Practice Labs: Preparing for the Cisco Certified Design Expert Lab Exam, Martin J. Duggan, Cisco Press, 2023.

Cisco Learning Network, CCDE v3.1 Blueprint and Resources.

Cisco Documentation: “Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure Design Guide,” Cisco.com.

Cisco Documentation: “Cisco SD-WAN Design Guide,” Cisco.com.

Open Networking Foundation: “OpenFlow Switch Specification,” Version 1.5.1.

Conclusion:

The correct answer isC (Control Path Reliability), as it directly addresses the requirements for fast failover, short-distance and resilient connections, reduced connectivity loss with smart recovery, and path diversity with capacity awareness. This component ensures robust communication between switches and controllers, aligning with the CCDE v3.1 blueprint’s focus on resilient SDN architectures.

Notes on Corrections and Process:

Typographical Errors Corrected:

Changed “survivabil-ity” to “survivability.”

Corrected “control-lers” to “controllers.”

Adjusted “controller stale consistency” to “controller state consistency” for clarity and accuracy, as “stale” is likely a typo and state consistency is a standard SDN term.

Standardized formatting (e.g., bullet points for requirements, consistent option labeling).

Verification Process:

Cross-referenced the question with the CCDE v3.1 blueprint from the Cisco Learning Network and Cisco Press resources (CCDE 400-007 Official Cert GuideandCCDE v3 Practice Labs).

Validated the role of control path reliability using Cisco’s SDN documentation (ACI and SD-WAN) and OpenFlow standards.

Ensured the explanation aligns with CCDE v3.1’s emphasis on resilient, high-availability network architectures.

D (Deploy SD-WAN edge routers in data center, then controllers, then branches):This allows the SD-WAN fabric to be built and stabilized centrally first, then controllers are brought online for policy orchestration, and finally, branch migrations happen gradually without impacting existing traffic paths.

Other options explained:

A/B/C: These approaches risk service disruption or poor controller orchestration readiness during branch migrations.

B (Encapsulation at source and destination):Overlay networks encapsulate payloads inside another protocol (e.g. VXLAN, GRE, MPLS), adding headers that enable separation from the underlay network while introducing minor overhead due to encapsulation.

Other options explained:

A: Describes underlay behavior.

C: Overlay encapsulation occurs independently of L3/L4 reliability.

D: NAT or VRF are isolation mechanisms but not how overlays function.

B (IPFIX telemetry data):IPFIX provides detailed flow-level visibility, enabling identification of traffic patterns, data flows, and destinations. This data is critical for understanding current traffic behavior to identify governance gaps and improve policy compliance.

Other options explained:

A: Secure tunnels protect traffic but do not identify governance gaps.

C: Firewalls provide limited flow visibility compared to telemetry.

D: Workload policies enforce security but do not aid initial visibility analysis.

A (MLAG/MC-LAG): Multi-chassis Link Aggregation (MLAG or MC-LAG) provides fast convergence by eliminating STP dependency and creating active-active Layer 2 uplinks.

E (UDLD): UniDirectional Link Detection helps quickly detect and disable one-way fiber failures, preventing loops before STP reacts.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: DHCP snooping provides security against rogue DHCP but not redundancy or fast convergence.

C: Root guard protects root bridge integrity but doesn’t enhance failover speed.

D: BPDU guard protects edge ports but does not contribute to core redundancy or convergence.

B: Service chaining in NFV can create suboptimal traffic flows depending on how virtualized functions are distributed.

E: NFV often requires orchestration platforms for lifecycle management, scaling, and automation of VNFs.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Bandwidth utilization may not necessarily increase.

C: NFV enables use of commodity servers, not high-end routers.

D: OpenFlow is not mandatory for NFV deployment.

—

Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) provides fast failure detection independent of routing protocols. It can be integrated with multiple protocols to accelerate convergence:

A: IS-IS supports BFD for fast hello processing.

B: BFD can track static routes via routing tracking features.

D: EIGRP supports BFD for link failure detection.

E: BGP supports BFD for rapid session teardown.

Why option C is incorrect:

C: RIP does not natively support BFD integration.

—

A (Fault management):Covers detection, isolation, notification, and resolution of network issues to ensure minimal downtime and service disruptions, directly aligning with the design goal of preventing and mitigating outages.

Other options explained:

B: Performance management monitors resource usage but doesn’t directly handle faults.

C: Security management handles authorization, authentication, and protection.

D: Accounting management deals with usage tracking for billing and auditing.

B: In transparent mode, the firewall operates at Layer 2 and can participate in STP to avoid loops.

C: Multicast traffic can traverse the firewall if allowed through transparent bridging rules.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Transparent mode requires no change to IP addressing.

D: Transparent firewalls do not form routing adjacencies.

E: Routed mode firewalls operate at Layer 3; transparent mode does not insert router hops.

—

Increasing jitter buffer size smoothens jitter but at the cost of introducing additional delay.

Excessive jitter buffering can lead to perceptible audio or video lag, impacting user experience.

C: Therefore, the undesired effect is increased transport delay, potentially leading to quality issues if the buffer size is too large.

Why other options are incorrect:

A & D: Jitter buffering does not improve jitter itself; it masks it at the expense of delay.

B: Jitter compensation doesn't increase jitter, but delay.

—

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) architecture is based on the logical decoupling of the control and data planes. According to the SDN reference model, the architecture typically includes the following planes:

Control Plane: This resides in the SDN controller and is responsible for decision-making, including route and policy calculations.

Application Plane: This layer contains business and network applications (e.g., firewalls, QoS policies) that communicate with the controller to request services and enforce policy.

These planes are essential in SDN architecture:

The control plane programs the forwarding behavior of network elements.

The application plane interacts via northbound APIs to define intent and service logic.

Options such as “Software plane” and “Network plane” are vague or not used in the SDN context. The “Management plane” is a separate functional layer and is not part of the architectural definition core to SDN as per CCDE v3.1.

==========

IPFIX probes can perform deep flow inspection beyond what routers/switches natively collect, making them well suited for security monitoring (DDoS detection, anomaly detection, intrusion attempts).

Probes can extract Layer 7 information unavailable from normal router flow records.

Why other options are incorrect:

A, C, D: Can also be done using router-integrated flow exports; dedicated probes are primarily deployed for advanced security visibility.

—

Bit Indexed Explicit Replication (BIER) eliminates the need for traditional multicast signaling protocols such as PIM.

BIER uses IGP extensions (e.g., OSPF or ISIS) to advertise BIER forwarding state.

The BIER header contains a bit-string indicating directly which receivers should receive the multicast packet, removing the need to build trees via signaling.

This design is emphasized in CCDE v3.1 as a significant advancement for efficient, scalable multicast in large modern service provider and enterprise networks.

Why other options are incorrect:

A, B, D: These options are invalid or fictitious terms in multicast protocol standards.

B (Strong cryptography for cardholder data):PCI DSS requires strong cryptographic protocols (e.g. TLS 1.2 or higher) to protect sensitive data during processing and storage.

C (Strong encryption for transmission):Data-in-transit across public or untrusted networks must be encrypted using strong protocols to comply with PCI DSS.

Other options explained:

A/D/E: These are general security best practices but not directly tied to TLS upgrade compliance for cardholder data under PCI DSS.

To achieve sub-50 millisecond convergence after a link or node failure, the design must rely on precomputed protection paths and local repair mechanisms in the data plane. The following mechanisms meet this requirement:

B. Ti-LFA (Topology Independent Loop-Free Alternate): A next-generation fast reroute method used in Segment Routing. It offers local protection by computing loop-free backup paths that are independent of the specific failure type (node or link). It's capable of sub-50 ms convergence by rerouting traffic immediately on failure.

D. MPLS-FRR (Fast Reroute): A traditional mechanism in MPLS networks that provides pre-signaled backup Label Switched Paths (LSPs). It enables fast switchover upon failure detection—also under 50 ms.

Other options:

A. BFD: Provides fast failure detection, but does not provide the actual traffic reroute mechanism.

C. Minimal BGP scan time: Impacts control plane responsiveness but not sub-50 ms convergence.

E. IGP fast hello: Improves failure detection but alone doesn’t guarantee traffic reroute under 50 ms.

==========

To achieve sub-50ms protection against both link and node failures, MPLS TE Fast Reroute (FRR) with Next-Next-Hop (NNHop) protection is used:

Next-Next-Hop tunnels provide node protection by pre-establishing a detour that bypasses not only the immediate next-hop link but also the entire next node.

This ensures protection for both link and node failures, matching SONET/SDH resiliency targets.

Other options explained:

A & C: TE backup and FRR backup tunnels may only provide link protection depending on deployment.

B: Next-Hop tunnels address only link failures, not node failures.

A (Scaling challenges for services):Centralized SDN controllers may experience scalability challenges for distributed services like DHCP and load balancing since these often require real-time responsiveness and distributed service locality.

D (Latency in reactive handling):Centralized controllers may introduce additional latency during reactive PACKET_IN event handling as control decisions traverse the control plane before forwarding happens.

Other options explained:

B: Centralized controllers still present failure domain risks; high-availability must be explicitly designed.

C: Smart NICs operate primarily at the host level, often independently of centralized SDN controllers.

E: Legacy equipment often lacks support for many SDN southbound APIs.

BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection) provides sub-second failure detection at the control plane level, making it the fastest convergence mechanism for Layer 3 routing protocols.

Fiber Ethernet typically offers higher reliability and lower latency than copper.

When combined, Fiber with BFD provides the most robust and quickest convergence for unidirectional failures in a routed data center environment.

Why other options are incorrect:

A & B: Copper adds more physical susceptibility to errors.

B & D: UDLD is a Layer 2 unidirectional detection mechanism, not optimized for Layer 3 convergence.

—

B (Flex Links): Flex Links provide an alternative to Spanning Tree in simple Layer 2 designs. One link is active while the other is backup, preventing loops while maintaining redundancy without running STP.

Other options explained:

A: vPC requires more advanced hardware and configuration.

C: FabricPath is typically used in data centers, not small branches.

D: 802.3ad is link aggregation, not redundant path management.

In IPv6, routers advertise prefixes via Router Advertisement (RA) messages. An attacker could inject rogue RAs to manipulate the IPv6 configuration of endpoints.

Router Advertisement Guard (RA Guard) blocks unauthorized RA messages from being received on access ports, preventing endpoints from receiving incorrect IPv6 prefixes from malicious or misconfigured devices.

This security feature is crucial when devices have IPv6 enabled but the network is IPv4-only.

Other options explained:

A: Source Guard and Prefix Guard enforce valid address and prefix assignment but do not prevent RA spoofing directly.

C: Prefix Guard focuses on controlling prefixes being assigned, not blocking RA messages.

D: Secure Neighbor Discovery (SEND) provides cryptographic protection but is rarely deployed due to complexity.

C: MPLS TE (Traffic Engineering) is designed to optimize IP traffic flow by considering bandwidth constraints, delay sensitivity, and administrative policy. It enables operators to steer traffic based on defined metrics rather than pure shortest-path IGP routes.

Other options:

A: MPLS TE can coexist with LDP and still rely on IGP for link-state info; it does not replace LDP.

B: MPLS TE by itself doesn’t provide protection; it requires Fast Reroute (FRR) mechanisms like link/node protection extensions.

D: MPLS TE is independent of VPN topology; it can operate without requiring a full-mesh of Layer 3 VPNs.

==========

B (Point-to-multipoint network type): OSPF point-to-multipoint allows the hub to see the DMVPN topology correctly without complex neighbor relationships.

E (Set spokes priority to 0): Ensures the hub always becomes DR, maintaining predictable OSPF adjacency behavior.

Other options explained:

A: Broadcast mode is inefficient and unnecessary in DMVPN designs.

C: Mixed network types complicate adjacency maintenance.

D: Manually setting the hub priority is redundant when spokes are at priority 0.

—

DUMPS (Designated Unified Multiprotocol Redistribution Strategy) using single-point redistribution with route tagging ensures scalable, loop-free redistribution.

Route tags prevent redistributed routes from being re-advertised into the originating protocol, avoiding routing loops even with multiple paths.

Single-point redistribution simplifies operational complexity compared to multipoint redistribution.

Why other options are incorrect:

A, B, D: ACLs are not scalable for filtering redistributed routes in large networks. Tags provide better control.

A (Device resiliency):Hardware redundancy (dual power supplies, supervisor modules, etc.) ensures device uptime.

D (Network resiliency):Redundant links, fast failover mechanisms, and loop-free designs ensure the overall network remains operational during failures.

Other options explained:

B: Device type is secondary if resiliency features are built-in.

C: Network type is not directly related to resiliency.

E: Network size influences scale, not availability.

A (PPDIOO - Prepare, Plan, Design, Implement, Operate, Optimize):PPDIOO is Cisco’s structured lifecycle methodology designed specifically for network design, deployment, and management. It ensures continuous improvement, iterative design, and aligns technical efforts with business goals throughout the entire network lifecycle.

Other options explained:

B: Waterfall is a generic software development methodology.

C: Spiral emphasizes iterative risk management for software development.

D: V model applies primarily to software verification and validation.

The SD-WAN architecture separates roles by function:

Orchestration Plane: Handles device lifecycle functions such as zero-touch provisioning (ZTP) and certificate distribution. It facilitates onboarding into the overlay securely and automatically.

Control Plane: Makes forwarding decisions and shares route and policy information.

Data Plane: Forwards packets.

Management Plane: Provides visibility, analytics, and template-based policy configuration.

Option A correctly identifies orchestration as the ZTP and bootstrapping component.

In 802.1d STP, convergence is influenced by hello timer, max_age, and forward_delay.

While hello_timer typically remains at 2 seconds, lowering max_age (default 20s) and forward_delay (default 15s) can speed up convergence.

Forward_delay controls the time spent in listening and learning states; max_age determines how long a BPDU is considered valid before recalculating topology.

Why other options are incorrect:

A, B, D: These timers (transit_delay, bpdu_delay, maximum_transmission_halt_delay) are not directly adjustable parameters in 802.1d implementations.

—

B (Layer 3 MPLS VPN hub and spoke):A hub-and-spoke MPLS VPN allows scalable branch-to-data-center communication with efficient routing, simplified management, and adequate support for real-time video across 200 branches.

Other options explained:

A: DMVPN is flexible but not as scalable or deterministic for 200-site enterprise video conferencing.

C: VPLS operates at Layer 2 and may introduce unnecessary broadcast domain scaling challenges.

D: Full mesh MPLS is difficult to manage for such a large number of sites.

D (Root Guard): Prevents unauthorized devices from becoming the STP root by blocking superior BPDUs on access ports.

E (BPDU Guard): Immediately shuts down ports that receive unexpected BPDUs, protecting against accidental or malicious connection of switches to access ports.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Loop Guard protects against unidirectional link failures but not unauthorized devices.

B: PortFast speeds up STP convergence on access ports but does not provide security.

C: DTF (Dynamic Trunking Protocol) is not a security feature.

—

B (Strategic planning): Long-term business-aligned decisions that shape future infrastructure needs.

D (Tactical planning): Short-to-mid-term activities that adjust design based on evolving operational realities, constraints, and priorities.

Why other options are incorrect:

A & E: While cost and business optimization are goals, they are not defined planning approaches.

C: Modular is a design methodology, not a planning approach.

—

A: FabricPath assigns a specific multicast (S,G) flow to one tree. A single (S,G) does not get load-balanced across multiple trees.

E: Overall multicast traffic across multiple (S,G) groups is distributed across multiple FabricPath trees, providing general load balancing and efficient link utilization across the fabric.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: Traffic load per tree may not be uniform due to different group distributions.

C: The assignment is done by the ingress switch based on hashing, not all leaf nodes assign the same tree.

D: Individual (S,G) flows do not get load-balanced across trees.

—

C (Transparent firewalling):Transparent (Layer 2) firewalls operate at the data link layer and allow segmentation and inspection of intra-VLAN traffic without requiring changes to the existing IP addressing. This is ideal for legacy environments where IP addresses are hard-coded, while still providing fine-grained security policies between applications in the same subnet.

Other options explained:

A: Perimeter firewalls cannot segment east-west traffic within a VLAN.

B: VACLs provide basic filtering but are not as scalable or flexible as transparent firewalls for stateful inspection.

D: Routed firewalls require Layer 3 boundaries, which would conflict with hard-coded IP design.

Ansible is an open-source automation tool that enables configuration management, application deployment, cloud provisioning, and orchestration.

It uses simple YAML-based playbooks and SSH-based connectivity, making it agentless, highly scalable, and easy to integrate with networking environments.

Commonly adopted in network automation, cloud infrastructure provisioning, and service orchestration as part of modern network design practices covered under CCDE v3.1.

Why other options are incorrect:

B (Contrail): Network virtualization platform, not primarily an automation tool.

C (Java): General-purpose programming language, not specifically designed for infrastructure automation.

D (Jinja2): Templating engine, used inside Ansible but not an automation tool by itself.

—

B (Separate priority queues): Both VoIP and the custom stock-trading application require low latency and jitter guarantees but serve different business functions. Best practice is to place them in separate priority queues to prevent one application's bursts from affecting the other, ensuring deterministic service levels for both mission-critical services.

Other options explained:

A: Sharing queues may lead to competition between traffic types, risking SLA violations.

C/D: CBWFQ is not sufficient for true low-latency guarantees; priority queuing is required.

—

Loop Guardis designed to protect againstSTP loop conditionsthat may occur whenBPDUs are unexpectedly missingon a point-to-point link. This is especially relevant in cases where UDLD (Unidirectional Link Detection) might not detect the problem quickly enough. When BPDUs are absent, a switch might erroneously assume that the link is safe to forward, potentially leading to atemporary Layer 2 loop.

UsingLoop Guardensures that a port moves into aloop-inconsistentstate instead of forwarding traffic if BPDUs are missing, effectively stopping a loop before it forms. This makes it acomplementary mechanism to UDLD, which focuses on detecting unidirectional links at the physical layer, not STP control plane failures.

This recommendation aligns with CCDE v3.1 best practices forresilient Layer 2 designs, which emphasize using multiple mechanisms in tandem to proactively prevent failure conditions before traffic is impacted.

Why other options are incorrect:

A. Root Guard: Prevents an unauthorized switch from becoming the root bridge but doesn't protect against missing BPDUs.

B. BPDU Guard: Used mainly on access ports to prevent BPDU reception; not intended for core loop prevention.

D. BPDU Filtering: Suppresses BPDU exchange entirely, which increases loop risk and is not suited for loop mitigation.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

B: Augmented SDN allows external applications or controllers to interact with the traditional control plane (e.g., RIB or FIB) via APIs, without fully replacing it.

A (replace) removes traditional control protocols entirely.

C (hybrid) uses both SDN and legacy control planes, but without deep integration.

D (distributed) refers to traditional decentralized control planes.

Augmented SDN enhances traditional routing with programmable control, offering near real-time visibility and dynamic response without disrupting the existing control architecture.

D: Traditional three-tier architectures (access, distribution, and core layers) require that east-west traffic (between servers or pods in different access layers) traverse up to the distribution or core and then back down—introducing unnecessary hops and latency. This is a key design limitation addressed by spine-leaf and fabric architectures.

Other options:

A: Bandwidth may be sufficient but not optimally utilized due to suboptimal pathing.

B: Security is not inherently compromised by architecture, although microsegmentation is harder.

C: Three-tier architectures can scale, but less efficiently and not without trade-offs like latency and complexity.

==========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Central command and control refers to a unified, centralized security policy and management platform that integrates and coordinates all security components—regardless of physical location or form factor (virtual, physical, cloud). It streamlines operations, reduces overhead, and improves visibility and control.

D is correct because central control simplifies policy enforcement and visibility.

A (threat-centric protection) focuses more on response and defense rather than architecture.

B (integrated actionable intelligence) refers to threat feeds, not central management.

C (distributed enforcement) is an implementation strategy, not a management component.

==========

In OSPF, a ring topology typically converges more slowly because:

Link failures can create longer SPF recalculations as alternate paths are fewer.

Only one alternate path usually exists for each link failure, extending the time needed for failure detection and SPF recalculation.

CCDE v3.1 stresses that designs like full mesh or triangulated topologies provide faster convergence due to multiple available alternate paths, which reduce SPF computation complexity.

Why other options are incorrect:

A, D, E: These topologies provide multiple paths.

B: Full mesh offers immediate redundancy for any failure.

—

Security design must be aligned with:

Business objectives (A): Security design must meet business needs without hindering operations.

Security policies and standards (B): Compliance with internal and external regulations is mandatory.

CCDE v3.1 teaches that security design always starts from business intent and policy compliance, not purely technical or scope-based factors.

Why other options are incorrect:

C & D: Security design applies to all environments, not just multi-site or new deployments.

—

B (Hybrid cloud): Combines private infrastructure with public cloud capabilities, offering flexibility for changing technology requirements while controlling operational expenses. The enterprise can invest CapEx in private resources while using public cloud elasticity for dynamic bandwidth or compute needs.

Hybrid solutions allow gradual migration and innovation while maintaining control and compliance over sensitive workloads.

Other options explained:

A: Private cloud limits flexibility and increases CapEx.

C: Public cloud minimizes CapEx but may increase OpEx for unpredictable workloads.

D: Multicloud adds complexity and often increases OpEx and operational management overhead.

—

The distribution layer serves as the boundary between the access and core layers in the three-tier hierarchical design. It plays a crucial role in providing policy enforcement, control, and boundary functions, including:

QoS classification and marking (C): The distribution layer serves as the boundary for Quality of Service policies. It marks and classifies traffic as it moves from access to core layers, ensuring proper QoS treatment in the core.

Redundancy and load balancing (E): The distribution layer provides link redundancy (e.g., dual-homing access layer switches) and performs load balancing to optimize path selection toward the core.

Other options explained:

A (Fast transport): Typically associated with the core layer, which focuses on high-speed forwarding.

B (Reliability): While reliability is a network-wide goal, it’s not a primary function of the distribution layer specifically.

D (Fault isolation): While partial fault containment occurs, primary fault isolation happens at the access layer.

—

End-to-end network visibility is often hindered by:

Siloed monitoring and logging systems

Vendor-specific platforms that don’t integrate

Inconsistent telemetry across domains (e.g., WAN, DC, Cloud)

Too many disparate solutions lead to data fragmentation, blind spots, and lack of unified analytics. This makes correlating threats and verifying policy enforcement complex. Overlapping controls (A) and manual processes (C) are operational concerns but don’t directly obstruct architectural visibility.

The CCDE blueprint emphasizes cross-domain visibility, consistent policy enforcement, and integration as central to a secure and scalable network design.

==========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

A: PaaS (Platform as a Service) solutions often introduce strong vendor-specific APIs, services, and tooling, making it difficult to migrate applications later—leading to vendor lock-in.

Other options:

B and C apply more to SaaS and IaaS models.

D: Multi-tenant security concerns are common in all models but not unique or predominant in PaaS.

==========

The SDN architecture separates the control plane from the data plane. In this model, the SDN controller is the central element responsible for:

Receiving application intent via northbound APIs

Translating intent into traffic policies

Communicating with infrastructure devices using southbound APIs

The SDN controller enforces policies such as path selection, QoS, and access control rules across the network fabric, ensuring traffic flows align with administrator-defined logic. Neither northbound nor southbound APIs enforce policy themselves; they serve as communication interfaces.

The packet forwarding engine (Option A) simply performs data-plane functions based on instructions, but does not interpret or apply policies.

==========

A (Posture assessment with remediation VLAN):Posture assessment checks endpoint compliance (such as AV definitions). Non-compliant devices are placed into a remediation VLAN where they can update before regaining normal network access.

Other options explained:

B: SGTs provide segmentation but are not posture-specific.

C: dACLs with SGTs handle policy enforcement, but posture control is required for AV compliance.

D: Quarantine VLAN isolates devices but doesn’t automate remediation.

HIPAA requires integrity controls to prevent unauthorized data modification.

D (Technical integrity and transmission security): Ensures PHI data is protected against unauthorized alteration during storage and transmission.

This directly addresses the issue of data being altered without consent.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Prevents unauthorized access but does not guarantee data integrity.

B: Administrative processes cover policies, not technical enforcement.

C: Focuses on physical device control, not data integrity.

—

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

B: Modular network design allows the network to be broken into independent functional units (modules) such as access, distribution, data center, WAN, and edge. When divesting part of a business, modularity allows specific segments (like a business unit or site) to be isolated and removed with minimal impact on other components.

Other options:

A (Redundant design): Enhances high availability but doesn't address separation or detachment flexibility.

C (Less complex design): While simpler, it may not provide the isolation necessary to enable selective detachment.

D (Routed access): Refers to Layer 3 access layer designs, useful in access control but not focused on business separation scenarios.

B (OpenFlow):OpenFlow is a widely used SDN southbound protocol that enables controllers to directly manage forwarding tables of switches.

D (Open vSwitch Database - OVSDB):OVSDB is used by SDN controllers (especially in virtualized environments) to manage configuration state and flow entries on Open vSwitch instances.

Other options explained:

A/C: Non-existent protocols.

E: NetFlow is a traffic monitoring protocol, not a control interface for SDN controllers.

A (BPDU Guard on access ports): Prevents accidental connection of switches or bridging devices on access ports, which could cause unexpected topology changes or loops.

C (Root Guard on aggregation switch downlinks): Ensures access switches cannot send superior BPDUs to challenge aggregation switch root status, maintaining predictable STP root placement.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: Aggregation downlinks are not normally configured with BPDU Guard (since they expect BPDUs from access switches).

D: Root guard on access ports is unnecessary as those ports should not participate in STP.

E: Edge port (Rapid STP concept) is good for faster convergence but doesn't address stability.

F: STP root and backup root election is important but not a specific STP feature — this is a design decision, not a stability feature.

A (VXLAN offers native loop avoidance): VXLAN uses Layer 3 underlay with encapsulation, inherently avoiding Layer 2 loops common in traditional Layer 2 fabrics.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: Storm control mitigates broadcast storms but doesn't prevent loops.

C: vPC+ helps but doesn’t replace VXLAN's loop-free architecture.

D: BPDU Guard helps protect edge ports, but loop prevention in VXLAN is primarily handled by its Layer 3 foundation.

D (Group Encrypted Transport VPN - GET VPN):GET VPN encrypts traffic across private WANs like MPLS while maintaining full-mesh routing visibility and offering centralized key management with minimal encapsulation overhead.

Other options explained:

A: S-VTI is used for point-to-point IPsec tunnels.

B: DMVPN is used for dynamic multipoint Internet-based VPNs.

C: MGRE is a tunneling protocol but lacks security features.

"Fate sharing" refers to multiple services or customers relying on the same physical or logical component. Minimizing fate sharing improves reliability by isolating failures:

Isolating customer services ensures that failure in one domain does not affect others.

Separating critical control and data planes enhances resiliency.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Bridging may introduce other issues but is not directly tied to fate sharing.

C: Redundancy enhances, not reduces, reliability.

D: Unicast overlay routing is not a fault domain problem in this context.

—

D (Python):Python is widely used for network automation, configuration management, and scripting tasks. It simplifies repeatable network changes, validation, and integration with controllers and APIs, reducing deployment time.

Other options explained:

A: LISP is a routing protocol, not an automation tool.

B: Java is a general-purpose language but not commonly used for network automation.

C: "Conclusion" is not a tool.

Software-defined network segmentation is a core element of secure cloud architecture models.

It isolates workloads, minimizes blast radius, and enforces east-west security controls in dynamic multi-tenant environments.

Why other options are less appropriate:

A: This is a principle of least privilege (IAM) but not a cloud architecture characteristic.

B: Dedicated workstations are endpoint measures, not architecture-level.

C: MFA protects identity but does not define architecture segmentation.

—

A (Access):QoS classification and marking should occur as close to the traffic source as possible—at the access layer—so that policies can be consistently applied throughout the network.

Other options explained:

B/D: QoS policies at these layers rely on markings applied earlier.

C: Collapsed core is simply core and distribution merged, but marking should still happen at access.

C (Transparent firewall): Operates at Layer 2, allowing filtering and inspection of traffic within the same subnet without requiring IP routing changes. It performs deep packet inspection while maintaining Layer 2 adjacency, making it ideal for intra-subnet traffic control in data centers.

This allows security segmentation inside broadcast domains, enforcing security policies even for east-west traffic.

Other options explained:

A: Routed firewalls require subnet boundaries and are not ideal for intra-subnet control.

B: VLAN ACLs provide basic filtering but lack deep packet inspection capabilities.

D: Zone-based firewalls are primarily designed for inter-subnet (Layer 3) traffic segmentation.

MLD (Multicast Listener Discovery) snooping for IPv6 operates similarly to IGMP snooping in IPv4. It tracks listener reports to restrict multicast flooding within a Layer 2 domain.

C: Querier elections are triggered when a querier becomes unreachable or its IP address changes.

D: The querier with the lowest IPv6 address is elected as the active querier, which manages report/query communication.

Other options:

A: QoS is not automatically enabled with MLD snooping.

B: MLD querier functionality operates per VLAN—not per group—so only one querier is elected per VLAN.

==========

B (Software as a Service - SaaS):SaaS provides end users with complete applications hosted and managed by third-party providers, accessed via web interfaces.

Other options explained:

A: PaaS provides platforms for application development, not complete applications.

C: IaaS provides compute/storage resources but not full applications.

D: WaaS (Workspace as a Service) is a niche model, not generally used as standard SaaS definition.

B (EAP - Extensible Authentication Protocol):EAP is commonly used for 802.1X port-based authentication, allowing identity-based control for users on the network. This enables policy enforcement, identity-based segmentation (micro/macro segmentation), and leverages existing domain credentials via backend integration.

Other options explained:

A: LDAP is backend directory, not an authentication protocol for access ports.

C: TACACS+ is used primarily for administrative access.

D: RADIUS transports the EAP exchange but is not the authentication protocol itself.

A picture containing table Description automatically generated

B: Faster control plane convergence reduces the total recovery time after failure detection.

D: Enabling lower layer detection (such as BFD or physical layer link failure detection) shortens the time it takes to notify the control plane about link failure.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Stability improves network operation but doesn’t address detection delay directly.

C: Interface flaps notification frequency doesn’t reduce initial detection delay — could actually create instability.

—

A: The overload bit (OL bit) signals other routers to avoid using the overloaded router as a transit path for Level 2 traffic. However, the overloaded router can still forward Level 1 local area traffic if applicable.

D: The overload bit is commonly used during router bootup to prevent temporary black holes while the router completes its routing protocol convergence and LSDB synchronization.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: CSNP prioritization is not related to overload bit functionality.

C: LSDB synchronization occurs through normal IS-IS mechanisms; overload bit is not involved.

E: The overload bit prevents transit usage, not attracts traffic.

A (IGMP Snooping): Controls IPv4 multicast traffic within VLANs by listening to IGMP join/leave messages and forwarding multicast only to interested ports.

B (MLD Snooping): Performs similar multicast control for IPv6 multicast traffic by listening to MLD protocol messages.

Both technologies reduce unnecessary multicast flooding inside VLANs.

Why other options are incorrect:

C (RGMP): Controls multicast on router-connected ports, not intra-VLAN.

D (PIM Snooping): Operates on PIM-enabled Layer 3 devices; less relevant for pure VLAN-based Layer 2 multicast control.

E (Pruning): Refers to multicast tree pruning in Layer 3 multicast routing, not VLAN Layer 2 control.

—

B (Cloud OnRamp for IaaS):This allows certain applications to have direct optimized access to public cloud resources while other enterprise traffic remains centralized. OnRamp for IaaS provides dynamic path selection and policy control based on application behavior and performance.

Other options explained:

A: MPLS L3VPN does not offer cloud-optimized direct access.

C: SaaS OnRamp is for SaaS applications, not IaaS workloads.

D: Direct Connect links to the cloud but lacks policy-driven traffic engineering.

A (Encryption + strong authentication) aligns most closely with Zero Trust’s emphasis on always verifying identity and protecting data as it moves across untrusted networks.

Data-in-motion encryption ensures confidentiality, and two-factor authentication ensures strict identity verification.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: Data-at-rest encryption is important but not as critical as controlling data in motion for Zero Trust.

C: Categorization helps in segmentation but is not the core Zero Trust principle.

D: High availability is a design requirement, not the primary Zero Trust security control.

—

C (SPF hold time): Controls the minimum amount of time between Shortest Path First (SPF) recalculations in link-state protocols like OSPF and IS-IS. This mechanism prevents frequent SPF runs due to rapid or transient topology changes, providing stability.

Other options explained:

A: Transmit delay affects LSA propagation but not routing protocol recalculation timing.

B: Throttle timers are related but primarily control LSA generation intervals.

D: Interface dampening suppresses flapping i

Encrypting data at rest and in transit is a fundamental best practice to ensure end-to-end data security.

It protects sensitive data both while stored (disk, database) and while moving across networks.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: IPsec secures specific tunnels, but isn’t a complete private cloud solution.

C: Vendor consistency doesn’t guarantee best practice.

D: Anonymization supports privacy but is not a core security best practice for data security.

—

A (Bottom-Up Approach): Starts with the evaluation of current infrastructure (hardware, protocols, configurations), followed by design adjustments based on identified gaps.

C (Top-Down Approach): Starts from business and application requirements, translating them into technical design and network architecture.

Both approaches are widely used in network design methodology depending on business requirements and organizational maturity, directly referenced in CCDE v3.1 design models.

Why other options are incorrect:

B & D: These are not valid or recognized network design approaches.

E: Three-tier is a network architecture model, not a design approach.

—

When data center fabrics are extended across multiple private and public clouds, as in hybrid or multi-cloud designs, enterprises benefit from:

C. Ability to place workloads across clouds: Application and workload mobility is a key outcome of interconnected data center fabrics. It supports disaster recovery, scaling, and cost optimization strategies.

D. Centralized visibility: Modern SDN/cloud-integrated platforms offer centralized control and monitoring across domains, giving IT teams end-to-end insight regardless of workload location.

These principles support the CCDE v3.1 goals for cloud-aligned architecture, which promotes flexibility, operational simplicity, and global-scale services.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Enhanced security is a benefit but not guaranteed simply by interconnecting clouds; it depends on the actual security controls in place.

B: Cloud deployments may compromise data and network ownership, especially in public models.

E: Cloud mobility is typically bidirectional when fully designed; unidirectional behavior is limiting and not an intended design goal.

B (Minimize operational costs): A common business goal to reduce long-term operating expenses.

E (Reduce complexity): Simplifying designs reduces operational overhead, risk, and failure domains.

Why other options are incorrect:

A: Resiliency is a design goal, but not a business objective itself.

C: Endpoint posture is a technical security feature.

D: Faster obsolescence contradicts business optimization.