Saylor BUS105 Managerial Accounting (SAYA-0009) Exam Exam Practice Test

—

To determine the gross profit before and after closing the Manufacturing Overhead account, we must analyze the journal entries and compute:

Total production cost (Cost of Goods Manufactured, or COGM)

Gross profit = Sales Revenue − COGS

Impact of closing overhead account

Step 1: Identify and sum all costs recorded in Work in Process (WIP):

From journal entries:

Direct materials added to WIP:WIP Dr 19 (from: Materials Cr 19)

Direct labor added to WIP:WIP Dr 26 (from: Wages Payable Cr 26)

Manufacturing overhead applied to WIP:WIP Dr 30 (from: Manufacturing Overhead Cr 30)

Total product cost (COGM):

= 19 (materials) + 26 (labor) + 30 (overhead applied)

= $75

Step 2: Record transfer to Finished Goods and then to COGS:

WIP Cr 75 → Finished Goods Dr 75

Then, Finished Goods Cr 75 → COGS Dr 75 (once sold)

Step 3: Calculate gross profit before closing overhead:

Revenue from sale = $150

COGS = $75Gross Profit = $150 − $75 = $75

Step 4: Check the Manufacturing Overhead account:

From journal entries:

Overhead actual incurred:Manufacturing Overhead Dr 31 (from Materials 10 and Wages Payable 21)

Overhead applied to WIP:Manufacturing Overhead Cr 30

Remaining balance in overhead account:

= 31 (debits) − 30 (credits) = 1 (debit balance → underapplied overhead)

Since the underapplied overhead is considered immaterial, it is closed to COGS:

Entry: COGS Dr 1 / Manufacturing Overhead Cr 1

New COGS = $75 (original) + $1 (underapplied) = $76

New Gross Profit = $150 − $76 = $74

Thus:

Gross profit before closing overhead: $75

Gross profit after closing overhead: $74→ Decreased by $1

However, this matches the description in option A (Gross profit was $44; decreased by $1). Wait — there's a conflict here.

Let’s double-check.

The gross profit we calculated is $75, not $44.

Let’s test the logic again.

WIP includes:

Materials: 19

Labor: 26

Overhead: 30→ Total = 75

Sale = $150

→ Gross profit = $150 − $75 = $75

Underapplied overhead = $1 → added to COGS

New gross profit = $74

So the answer should say: Gross profit was $75; decreased by $1 → that would match option C.

But option C says: Gross profit was $75; gross profit decreased by $1.00 after closing manufacturing overhead. That matches our calculation.

So, correct answer: C

CORRECTION: The earlier answer marked as A was misaligned with the actual computed values. Based on this revised and verified calculation:

Answer: C

—

Final Calculations Summary:

Direct Materials: $19

Direct Labor: $26

Applied Overhead: $30

Total Cost (COGS before adjustment): $75

Revenue: $150

Gross Profit (before adjustment): $75

Overhead underapplied by $1 → Increases COGS to $76

Gross Profit (after adjustment): $74

Gross Profit Decreased by $1.00 after closing overhead

—

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The Manufacturing Overhead account is used to track both actual and applied overhead. At the end of the period, the difference is calculated:

If actual > applied → underapplied (debit balance)

If applied > actual → overapplied (credit balance)

Answer: A

—

We are given:

Fixed costs = $60,000

Selling price per unit = $25.00

Variable cost per unit = $12.50

Tax rate = 20%

Desired after-tax profit = $100,000

Step 1: Calculate Contribution Margin Per Unit

= Selling Price – Variable Cost

= $25.00 − $12.50 = $12.50

Step 2: Convert After-Tax Profit to Before-Tax Profit

We must first determine the before-tax profit required to result in a $100,000 after-tax profit.

Before-tax profit = After-tax profit ÷ (1 − tax rate)

= $100,000 ÷ (1 − 0.20) = $100,000 ÷ 0.80 = $125,000

Step 3: Use CVP (Cost-Volume-Profit) Formula for Units:

Required units = (Fixed Costs + Before-Tax Profit) ÷ Contribution Margin per Unit

= ($60,000 + $125,000) ÷ $12.50

= $185,000 ÷ $12.50 = 14,800 units

Wait! This contradicts the earlier stated answer. Let's re-check:

Recalculating:

$185,000 ÷ $12.50 = 14,800 units

So, the correct number of units needed is:

Answer: B. 14,800 units✅

—

Apologies for the initial misstatement. Let's now fix that:

—

Final Corrected Answer: B

Contribution Margin per Unit = $25 – $12.50 = $12.50

Required before-tax profit = $100,000 ÷ (1 − 0.20) = $125,000

Break-even formula with profit:

Required units = (Fixed costs + Target before-tax profit) ÷ CM/unit

= ($60,000 + $125,000) ÷ $12.50

= $185,000 ÷ $12.50 = 14,800 units

Therefore, the business must sell 14,800 units to achieve an after-tax profit of $100,000.

Target cost is a pricing strategy that starts with the selling price and subtracts the desired profit to determine the maximum allowable cost.

Formula:

Target Cost = Selling Price − Desired Profit

Desired Profit = Selling Price × Profit Percentage

= $350 × 0.40 = $140

Target Cost = $350 − $140 = $210

Answer: C

Bethel Bakery uses multiple departments (blending, cutting, baking, decorating, packaging) to produce a standardized product—frosted sugar cookies—in a continuous, repetitive flow. This is a textbook example of a business that uses process costing.

According to Saylor Academy BUS105:

“Process costing is used when the production process is continuous, and the units of output are indistinguishable from each other. Separate work-in-process (WIP) accounts are typically maintained for each department.”

Let’s evaluate the options:

A. Job costing is used for customized or unique products (e.g., custom furniture).

B. Process costing is used for mass-produced items through multiple production departments.✅

C. Departmental costing refers to applying overhead by department, not necessarily tied to production cost method.

D. Activity-based costing focuses on cost allocation based on activities but does not define how WIP is tracked across departments.

Answer: B

Activity-Based Management (ABM) uses data from Activity-Based Costing (ABC) to improve operational efficiency and reduce costs by identifying and managing activities that add value.

Relocating the packaging department closer to shipping improves workflow, reduces non-value-added activities (like transportation time), and is an example of a decision driven by ABM.

The Statement of Cash Flows is divided into three sections:

Operating Activities

Investing Activities

Financing Activities

Financing activities include transactions related to:

Issuing or repurchasing stock

Borrowing or repaying debt

Paying dividends (including to noncontrolling interests)

Let’s review the choices:

A. Cash receipts from customers → Operating activity

B. Increase in accounts receivable → Operating activity (non-cash adjustment)

C. Purchase of property and equipment → Investing activity

D. Cash dividends paid to noncontrolling interests → Financing activity✅

Per Saylor Academy – Managerial Accounting (BUS105), Unit 11:

“The financing section includes transactions involving long-term liabilities and equity. Examples include issuing stock, borrowing cash, repaying debt, and paying dividends.”

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Management by Exception is a management style that focuses attention and resources on areas where actual results deviate significantly from expected results.

According to Saylor Academy BUS105:

“Management by exception is a principle where managers focus only on significant variances between actual and budgeted results.”

Only Option D reflects a significant unfavorable variance that exceeds a predefined threshold—this is exactly the kind of situation where management by exception would trigger action.

Answer: D

—

Cost behavior refers to how a cost will change as the level of business activity changes. According to managerial accounting principles, cost behavior is predictable and reliable only within a certain scope of activity levels. This scope is known as the "relevant range."

The relevant range is defined as:

“The range of activity over which cost behavior assumptions are valid. Within this range, fixed costs remain constant in total, and variable costs vary proportionately with activity.”

(Source: Saylor Academy, BUS105: Managerial Accounting – Unit 1.3: Cost Classifications for Predicting Cost Behavior)

This means that if production or activity remains within this range, fixed costs do not change, and variable costs change at a consistent rate per unit. However, if activity goes beyond or falls below this range, the cost behavior assumptions may no longer be accurate.

Let's examine the other options:

A. Free cash flow: This refers to the amount of cash a company has after capital expenditures. It has no direct relationship with the predictability of cost behavior.

C. The current ratio: This is a liquidity ratio measuring current assets against current liabilities. It also does not relate to cost behavior.

D. A contribution margin: While the contribution margin is used in analyzing profitability, it is a result of cost behavior analysis—not the range within which costs behave reliably.

Therefore, B. A relevant range is the correct and only option describing the range within which cost behavior patterns tend to be valid and reliable.

—

Formula for Materials Quantity Variance (MQV):

MQV = (Actual Quantity Used – Standard Quantity Allowed) × Standard Price

Given:

Actual quantity used = 1,580,000 lbs

Actual output = 800,000 boxes

Standard quantity per unit = 2 lbs/box→ Standard quantity allowed = 800,000 × 2 = 1,600,000 lbs

Standard price = $3.00/lb

MQV = (1,580,000 – 1,600,000) × $3.00

= (–20,000) × $3.00 = –$60,000 → Favorable

Favorable because actual usage was less than expected.

Answer: A

This is an ethical dilemma. The correct course of action is to refer to the company’s ethical policy or code of conduct for handling such situations. According to the IMA (Institute of Management Accountants) Statement of Ethical Professional Practice, the first step when facing an ethical conflict is:

“Follow the organization’s established policies on the resolution of such conflict. If these policies do not resolve the ethical conflict, consider discussing the issue with an immediate supervisor.”

Step-by-step Calculation:

Step 1: Calculate current variable cost per unit:

Variable cost per unit = $128,500 / 25,700 = $5.00

Step 2: Increase variable cost per unit by 10%:

New variable cost per unit = $5.00 × 1.10 = $5.50

Step 3: Determine sales price per unit:

Sales per unit = $385,500 / 25,700 = $15.00

Step 4: Contribution margin per unit for year 2:

= $15.00 − $5.50 = $9.50

Step 5: Use CVP formula to solve for required units to achieve same profit:

Required Units = (Fixed Costs + Target Profit) / Contribution Margin per Unit

= ($181,500 + $75,500) / $9.50

= $257,000 / $9.50 = 27,053 units (rounded)

Step 6: Compute required sales in dollars:

= 27,053 units × $15.00 = $405,795 ≈ $405,789

Answer: C. $405,789

—

We are asked to calculate:

Cost per equivalent unit for direct labor

Direct labor cost assigned to ending work in process (WIP) inventory

Step 1: Determine the cost per equivalent unit for direct labor:

Cost per equivalent unit = Total Direct Labor Cost / Total Equivalent Units for Direct Labor

= $11,900 / 850

= $14 per equivalent unit

Step 2: Determine the equivalent units of direct labor in ending WIP inventory:

From the table:

Ending WIP Inventory = 600 physical units

Equivalent Units for Direct Labor = 500 units

Step 3: Compute the direct labor cost assigned to ending WIP:

= Equivalent Units in Ending WIP × Cost per Equivalent Unit

= 500 × $14

= $7,000

However, this does not match the answer in Option B, which says $8,400. Let’s double-check the correct equivalent units:

Wait! The total equivalent units for Direct Labor is 850. Of these, 350 are from the units completed and transferred, and the remaining 500 (ending WIP) is provided. So, the 500 figure is confirmed as correct for ending WIP.

So, cost assigned to ending WIP: 500 × $14 = $7,000

Correct answer should therefore be:

A. $14 per equivalent unit; $7,000 direct labor cost assigned to ending WIP inventory

(There appears to be an inconsistency in answer choices — Option A is actually correct based on accurate calculation.)

Therefore, Final Correct Answer: A

—

Option 1:

Monthly lease: $225

Included: 1,500 copies/month = 18,000 copies/year

Additional: $0.15 per copy over 18,000

Option 2:

Monthly lease: $250

Included: 1,800 copies/month = 21,600 copies/year

Additional: $0.02 per copy over 21,600

Total copies expected: 22,500

Option 1:

Annual lease = $225 × 12 = $2,700

Extra copies = 22,500 – 18,000 = 4,500 × $0.15 = $675

Total cost = $2,700 + $675 = $3,375

Option 2:

Annual lease = $250 × 12 = $3,000

Extra copies = 22,500 – 21,600 = 900 × $0.02 = $18

Total cost = $3,000 + $18 = $3,018

Savings = $3,375 − $3,018 = $357

This is a classic cost comparison decision problem where the differential costs are evaluated to determine the lower-cost alternative. Based on cost-volume information and break-even comparison logic, Option 2 provides the lowest cost.